![]() (which has far more settings that I don’t understand yet) so I love the simplicity and power of MacPhun in this respect.Īffinity is overall faster then Macphun (at least on my machine). So for example I find it much easier to use Snapheal (which does an excellent job), than the retouch tool of Affinity. The downside of this is, at least to me as non-photoshop user, that it is more difficult to use (learning curve). Several people already trashed their Photoshop app. In my opinion (and of several people on the internet) it is a very powerful tool which, already today, in many aspects can compete with Photoshop. The stand-alone version of Affinity provides much more functionality to even manually adjust the RAW conversion settings for the conversion, and you can choose different RAW-engines as well.įurther more Affinity Photo’s is much more of a “Photoshop” tool then the MacPhun suite. In the extensions they simple use the Apple core-image RAW conversions (which is fine for me). Must say though that I love the power and simplicity of the UI from the Macphun software.Īffinity Photo’s does a much better job on handling RAW-footage. I reported this already > two months ago, today Macphun told me that they are still working on the problem. (Photo’s will then pass a jpeg in stead of a RAW). The photo’s show uncorrected lens-distortions, to solve this I first have to do some editing in Photo’s and then use those extensions. This means that I cannot use the RAW files from Photo’s to directly use those two extensions. I must conclude that two of the Macphun apps, “noisless” and “intensify” don’t correct the RAW-files I use whereas Apples Photo’s does. ![]() So I will share them with you.įirst of all I should tell you that I prefer working with RAW. ![]() I just had my first experiences with Affinity Photo using their trial.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |